| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i5-1335U


Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1.1 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
b06a3
Core
Lucienne
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Zen 2
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
37.94k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
26.18k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
13.86k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
14.48k (x2.22)
TOTAL
53.76k
92.46k (x1.72)

Multithread

5500U

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
125.7k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
93.63k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
46.18k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
16.75k (x3.8)
TOTAL
261.91k
282.25k (x1.08)

Performance/W
5500U
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500U
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4