Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2.1 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2.1 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
806d1
Core
Lucienne
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
24.09k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
19.54k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
8.48k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
11.68k (x1.79)
TOTAL
53.76k
63.79k (x1.19)
Multithread
5500U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
220.79k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
225.98k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
79.1k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
11.32k (x2.57)
TOTAL
261.91k
537.18k (x2.05)
Performance/W
5500U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4