Ryzen 5 5500 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The 5500 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 324 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 1.7 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 324 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 1.7 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306e4
Core
Cezanne
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
10 /20
TDP
65 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25600 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
80.52k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.05k points
551.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
10.55k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
10.02k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.3k
3.99k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.19k
3.66k (x0.17)
TOTAL
68.8k
28.23k (x0.41)
Multithread
5500
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
80.25k
215.04k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
163.59k
230.43k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.83k
96.87k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.34k
8.76k (x1.19)
TOTAL
324.01k
551.1k (x1.7)
Performance/W
5500
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1235 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2517 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1120 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
4985 points/W
4792 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3648 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5472 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2214 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5046 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
16381 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4