| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500 vs Xeon E5-1660 v4


Description
The 5500 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 324 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500 is 1 times faster than the E5-1660 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
406f1
Core
Cezanne
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2022
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
80.52k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.05k points
320.49k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
12.41k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
17.23k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.3k
4.89k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.19k
3.07k (x0.15)
TOTAL
68.8k
37.6k (x0.55)

Multithread

5500

E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
80.25k
102.11k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
163.59k
156.5k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.83k
42.08k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.34k
19.8k (x2.7)
TOTAL
324.01k
320.49k (x0.99)

Performance/W
5500
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1235 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2517 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1120 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
4985 points/W
2289 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3648 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5472 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2214 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5046 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
16381 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4