Ryzen 5 5500 vs Core i5-10400F
Description
The 5500 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0655
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2022
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
80.52k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.05k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.09k
28.39k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
24.89k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.94k
5.78k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.89k
13.19k (x0.58)
TOTAL
80.52k
72.25k (x0.9)
Multithread
5500
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
124.44k
180.2k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
167.06k
163.51k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
74.34k
40.6k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
6.48k (x0.9)
TOTAL
373.05k
390.78k (x1.05)
Performance/W
5500
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2570 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
5739 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5261 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5855 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2604 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5451 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
19170 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4