Ryzen 5 5500 vs Core i5-10400
Description
The 5500 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0653
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
80.52k points
69.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.05k points
367.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
22.09k
27.46k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
24.28k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.94k
5.65k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.89k
11.92k (x0.52)
TOTAL
80.52k
69.31k (x0.86)
Multithread
5500
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
124.44k
165.5k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
167.06k
156.32k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
74.34k
39.88k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
5.96k (x0.83)
TOTAL
373.05k
367.65k (x0.99)
Performance/W
5500
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
2546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2570 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/W
614 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
5739 points/W
5656 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
5261 points/GHz
6386 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5855 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2604 points/GHz
1314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5451 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
TOTAL
19170 points/GHz
16118 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4