| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500 vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The 5500 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.7 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b0671
Core
Cezanne
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2022
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
80.52k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.05k points
1763.08k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
31.8k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
32.83k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.3k
18.37k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.19k
21.13k (x1)
TOTAL
68.8k
104.13k (x1.51)

Multithread

5500

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
80.25k
532.97k (x6.64)
Test#2 (FP)
163.59k
596.78k (x3.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.83k
342.96k (x4.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.34k
28.6k (x3.9)
TOTAL
324.01k
1501.31k (x4.63)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.09k
58.6k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
33.29k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.94k
17.77k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.89k
19.49k (x0.85)
TOTAL
80.52k
129.15k (x1.6)

Multithread

5500

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
124.44k
804.04k (x6.46)
Test#2 (FP)
167.06k
613.45k (x3.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
74.34k
311.08k (x4.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
34.5k (x4.79)
TOTAL
373.05k
1763.08k (x4.73)

Performance/W
5500
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2570 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
5739 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5261 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5855 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2604 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5451 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
19170 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4