| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500 vs Core i9-12900KF


Description
The 5500 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 3.3 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
90672
Core
Cezanne
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/24
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2022
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
80.52k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.05k points
1219.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
28.96k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
30k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.3k
16.94k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.19k
17.14k (x0.81)
TOTAL
68.8k
93.05k (x1.35)

Multithread

5500

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
80.25k
166.25k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
163.59k
172.03k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.83k
96.95k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.34k
55.78k (x7.6)
TOTAL
324.01k
491.01k (x1.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
22.09k
57.05k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
29.66k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.94k
16.48k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.89k
17.78k (x0.78)
TOTAL
80.52k
120.97k (x1.5)

Multithread

5500

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
124.44k
546.04k (x4.39)
Test#2 (FP)
167.06k
437.01k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
74.34k
211.36k (x2.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
24.92k (x3.46)
TOTAL
373.05k
1219.33k (x3.27)

Performance/W
5500
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2570 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
5739 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5261 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5855 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2604 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5451 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
19170 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4