Ryzen 5 5500 vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 5500 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.4 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.4 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806d1
Core
Cezanne
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
80.52k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.05k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
22.09k
24.09k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
19.54k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.94k
8.48k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.89k
11.68k (x0.51)
TOTAL
80.52k
63.79k (x0.79)
Multithread
5500
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
124.44k
220.79k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
167.06k
225.98k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
74.34k
79.1k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
11.32k (x1.57)
TOTAL
373.05k
537.18k (x1.44)
Performance/W
5500
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2570 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
5739 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
5261 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5855 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2604 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5451 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
19170 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4