Ryzen 5 4600H vs N100
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
b06e0
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
3 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
15.23k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
11.04k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
5.54k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
4.98k (x0.69)
TOTAL
54.11k
36.79k (x0.68)
Multithread
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
37.07k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
32.57k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
14.75k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
3.9k (x0.82)
TOTAL
334.72k
88.29k (x0.26)
Performance/W
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4