Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i7-8565U
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i7-8565U gets 142.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.3 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i7-8565U gets 142.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.3 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806eb
Core
Renoir
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
67.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
142.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
27.2k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
23.47k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
4.91k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
12.25k (x1.71)
TOTAL
54.11k
67.83k (x1.25)
Multithread
4600H
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
64.33k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
58.47k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
15.82k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
3.93k (x0.82)
TOTAL
334.72k
142.55k (x0.43)
Performance/W
4600H
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
4288 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
3898 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
1055 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
262 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
9503 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5103 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1067 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2663 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
14746 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4