Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i7-8086K
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 1.1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 1.1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ea
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2020
June 2018
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
72.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
352.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
28.74k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
25.31k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
5.78k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
13.12k (x1.83)
TOTAL
54.11k
72.95k (x1.35)
Multithread
4600H
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
160.53k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
147.29k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
35.65k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
8.92k (x1.87)
TOTAL
334.72k
352.4k (x1.05)
Performance/W
4600H
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
375 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
3709 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5063 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
14590 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4