Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i3-7100
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.7 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
124.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
25.53k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
22.98k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
5.37k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
3.97k (x0.55)
TOTAL
54.11k
57.86k (x1.07)
Multithread
4600H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
54.73k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
53.55k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
12.93k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
3.6k (x0.75)
TOTAL
334.72k
124.8k (x0.37)
Performance/W
4600H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
1050 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
2447 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
6547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5893 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
14836 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4