Ryzen 5 4600H vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.3 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
800f82
Core
Renoir
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
15.34k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
25.75k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
5.79k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
17.95k (x2.5)
TOTAL
54.11k
64.83k (x1.2)
Multithread
4600H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
123.07k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
239.3k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
60.6k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
8.18k (x1.71)
TOTAL
334.72k
431.14k (x1.29)
Performance/W
4600H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4