Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i3-13100F
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.2 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
b06f5
Core
Renoir
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
47.14k (x3.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
25.77k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
13.25k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
14.77k (x2.06)
TOTAL
54.11k
100.94k (x1.87)
Multithread
4600H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
168.51k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
142.8k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
63.57k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
15.34k (x3.21)
TOTAL
334.72k
390.23k (x1.17)
Performance/W
4600H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4