Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i7-1260P
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.2 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.2 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906a3
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-P
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/16
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
391.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
41.94k (x2.71)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
26.81k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
12.63k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
13.51k (x1.88)
TOTAL
54.11k
94.9k (x1.75)
Multithread
4600H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
168.12k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
148.09k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
60.28k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
14.58k (x3.06)
TOTAL
334.72k
391.07k (x1.17)
Performance/W
4600H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
13967 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4