| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i3-1220P


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i3-1220P gets 404.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 1.2 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906a4
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2020
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
81.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
404.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
37.43k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
19.6k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
12.99k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
11.9k (x1.66)
TOTAL
54.11k
81.92k (x1.51)

Multithread

4600H

i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
178.85k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
153.82k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
69.38k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
2.69k (x0.56)
TOTAL
334.72k
404.74k (x1.21)

Performance/W
4600H
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
6387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
5494 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
14455 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
8506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
2953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2704 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
18618 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4