Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.6 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.6 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806d1
Core
Renoir
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
24.09k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
19.54k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
8.48k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
11.68k (x1.63)
TOTAL
54.11k
63.79k (x1.18)
Multithread
4600H
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
220.79k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
225.98k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
79.1k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
11.32k (x2.37)
TOTAL
334.72k
537.18k (x1.6)
Performance/W
4600H
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4