| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4500U vs Core i5-7400


Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4500U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
173.7k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
22.37k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
19.46k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
4.44k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
6.41k (x1.02)
TOTAL
52.44k
52.69k (x1)

Multithread

4500U

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
79.57k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
71.41k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
16.44k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
6.27k (x1.13)
TOTAL
194.34k
173.7k (x0.89)

Performance/W
4500U
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
1224 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
2672 points/W

Performance/GHz
4500U
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
15053 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4