Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2680 v3
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
306f2
Core
Matisse
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
36.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
426.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
18.86k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
10.06k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
4.14k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
3.24k (x0.15)
TOTAL
70.55k
36.31k (x0.51)
Multithread
3600
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
218.93k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
139.75k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
55.47k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
12.42k (x0.45)
TOTAL
348.35k
426.58k (x1.22)
Performance/W
3600
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
1824 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
1165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
3555 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
5716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
11002 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4