| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ed
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
276.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
4.53k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
18.24k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
5.76k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
13.01k (x0.55)
TOTAL
52.85k
41.54k (x0.79)

Multithread

3600

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
24.3k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
97.88k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
29.85k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
11.93k (x0.33)
TOTAL
223.36k
163.95k (x0.73)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
16.32k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
23.42k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
6.04k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
13.24k (x0.53)
TOTAL
70.05k
59.03k (x0.84)

Multithread

3600

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
86.92k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
126.14k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
29.62k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
11.86k (x0.21)
TOTAL
358.85k
254.54k (x0.71)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
16.31k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
24.48k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
5.87k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
13.02k (x0.6)
TOTAL
66.27k
59.67k (x0.9)

Multithread

3600

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
87.54k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
131.05k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
28.47k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
11.8k (x0.36)
TOTAL
338.19k
258.87k (x0.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
25.22k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
21.97k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
5.02k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
10.71k (x0.49)
TOTAL
70.55k
62.92k (x0.89)

Multithread

3600

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
125.56k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
115.86k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
25.63k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
9.4k (x0.34)
TOTAL
348.35k
276.46k (x0.79)

Performance/W
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4