Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i5-8259U
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806ea
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
54.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
229k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
21.06k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
19.79k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
4.72k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
8.98k (x0.41)
TOTAL
70.55k
54.55k (x0.77)
Multithread
3600
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
96.43k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
85.46k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
22.31k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
24.81k (x0.91)
TOTAL
348.35k
229k (x0.66)
Performance/W
3600
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
3444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
3052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
797 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
886 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
8179 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
5543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5208 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2363 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
14355 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4