| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i5-10400F


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0653
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
4.3k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
16.56k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
5.25k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
12.61k (x0.53)
TOTAL
52.85k
38.72k (x0.73)

Multithread

3600

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
18.1k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
79.16k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
26.75k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
13.81k (x0.38)
TOTAL
223.36k
137.82k (x0.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
26.28k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
23.38k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
5.52k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
12.96k (x0.6)
TOTAL
70.55k
68.14k (x0.97)

Multithread

3600

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
163.67k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
159.74k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
39k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
7.56k (x0.28)
TOTAL
348.35k
369.97k (x1.06)

Performance/W
3600
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4