| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 2 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
806d0
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
24576 kB
Date
July 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
4.4k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
20.25k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
11.69k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
11.66k (x0.49)
TOTAL
52.85k
48.01k (x0.91)

Multithread

3600

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
38.93k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
191.89k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
108.8k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
14.95k (x0.41)
TOTAL
223.36k
354.57k (x1.59)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
15.22k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
25.2k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
12.66k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
11.66k (x0.47)
TOTAL
70.05k
64.74k (x0.92)

Multithread

3600

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
155.37k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
260.27k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
115.37k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
20.04k (x0.36)
TOTAL
358.85k
551.04k (x1.54)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
17.25k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
25.53k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
12.56k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
11.4k (x0.53)
TOTAL
66.27k
66.74k (x1.01)

Multithread

3600

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
144.5k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
243.41k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
109.02k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
16k (x0.49)
TOTAL
338.19k
512.94k (x1.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
30.84k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
26.38k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
12.66k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
11.74k (x0.54)
TOTAL
70.55k
81.62k (x1.16)

Multithread

3600

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
294.86k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
280.92k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
113.9k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
20.16k (x0.74)
TOTAL
348.35k
709.85k (x2.04)

Performance/W
3600
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4