| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 2 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
810f81
Core
Matisse
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
3.78k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
16.42k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
4.75k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
5.51k (x0.23)
TOTAL
52.85k
30.46k (x0.58)

Multithread

3600

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
15.18k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
74.87k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
27.85k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
6.08k (x0.17)
TOTAL
223.36k
123.97k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
13.72k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
22.93k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
4.99k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
5.27k (x0.24)
TOTAL
70.55k
46.91k (x0.66)

Multithread

3600

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
50.54k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
93.33k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
25.25k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
6.07k (x0.22)
TOTAL
348.35k
175.18k (x0.5)

Performance/W
3600
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4