Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i9-13980HX
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i9-13980HX gets 1317.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 3.8 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i9-13980HX gets 1317.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 3.8 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b0671
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-HX
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048+16x4096 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
116.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
1317.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
54.07k (x3.37)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
30.22k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
15.67k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
16.09k (x0.74)
TOTAL
70.55k
116.05k (x1.64)
Multithread
3600
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
597.18k (x5.26)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
466.55k (x3.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
225.13k (x3.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
28.67k (x1.05)
TOTAL
348.35k
1317.53k (x3.78)
Performance/W
3600
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
10858 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
8483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
4093 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
23955 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
9655 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5396 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
2798 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2874 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
20723 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4