Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i9-13900K
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 5.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b0671
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
July 2019
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
1763.08k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
9.77k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
24.52k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
17.17k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
21.37k (x0.9)
TOTAL
52.85k
72.83k (x1.38)
Multithread
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
145.21k (x6.57)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
444.95k (x4.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
318.3k (x5.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
27.2k (x0.75)
TOTAL
223.36k
935.66k (x4.19)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
31.93k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
31.54k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
18.8k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
20.82k (x0.84)
TOTAL
70.05k
103.09k (x1.47)
Multithread
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
522.07k (x5.39)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
584.17k (x4.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
344.38k (x4.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
25.36k (x0.45)
TOTAL
358.85k
1475.97k (x4.11)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
31.8k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
32.83k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
18.37k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
21.13k (x0.97)
TOTAL
66.27k
104.13k (x1.57)
Multithread
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
532.97k (x5.65)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
596.78k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
342.96k (x4.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
28.6k (x0.87)
TOTAL
338.19k
1501.31k (x4.44)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
58.6k (x3.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
33.29k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
17.77k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
19.49k (x0.9)
TOTAL
70.55k
129.15k (x1.83)
Multithread
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
804.04k (x7.08)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
613.45k (x4.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
311.08k (x4.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
34.5k (x1.26)
TOTAL
348.35k
1763.08k (x5.06)
Performance/W
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
14105 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4