| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i9-12900KF


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 3.5 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
90672
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/24
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
1219.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
28.96k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
30k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
16.94k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
17.14k (x0.79)
TOTAL
66.27k
93.05k (x1.4)

Multithread

3600

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
166.25k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
172.03k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
96.95k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
55.78k (x1.7)
TOTAL
338.19k
491.01k (x1.45)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
57.05k (x3.56)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
29.66k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
16.48k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
17.78k (x0.82)
TOTAL
70.55k
120.97k (x1.71)

Multithread

3600

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
546.04k (x4.81)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
437.01k (x3.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
211.36k (x3.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
24.92k (x0.91)
TOTAL
348.35k
1219.33k (x3.5)

Performance/W
3600
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4