Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i5-11400T
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 223.4 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.3 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 223.4 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.3 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0671
Core
Matisse
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
67.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
3.51k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
14.2k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
7.63k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
6.06k (x0.25)
TOTAL
52.85k
31.39k (x0.59)
Multithread
3600
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
7.4k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
31.37k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
18.11k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
10.23k (x0.28)
TOTAL
223.36k
67.1k (x0.3)
Performance/W
3600
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
340 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1662 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
560 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
3436 points/W
1917 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1001 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4132 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1786 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5664 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
12584 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4