| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.3 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
3.45k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
9.96k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
4.26k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
4.27k (x0.85)
TOTAL
30.24k
21.94k (x0.73)

Multithread

3550H

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
14.01k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
37.68k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
17.05k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
7.35k (x1.3)
TOTAL
108.67k
76.09k (x0.7)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
19.17k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
10.55k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.79k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.65k (x1.1)
TOTAL
45.07k
39.16k (x0.87)

Multithread

3550H

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
73.13k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
42.06k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
18.03k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
7.54k (x1.55)
TOTAL
178.26k
140.76k (x0.79)

Performance/W
3550H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4