Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i3-10100
Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0653
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
22.74k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
20.31k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.71k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
7.65k (x1.8)
TOTAL
45.07k
55.41k (x1.23)
Multithread
3550H
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
71.95k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
67.7k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
16.43k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
6.25k (x1.29)
TOTAL
178.26k
162.33k (x0.91)
Performance/W
3550H
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
3550H
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4