| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Ryzen 7 6800H


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.7 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a40f41
Core
Picasso
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen+
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
21.04k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
22.41k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
10.21k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
24.27k (x5.73)
TOTAL
45.07k
77.93k (x1.73)

Multithread

3550H

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
158.65k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
215.86k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
89.45k (x3.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
14.77k (x3.05)
TOTAL
178.26k
478.73k (x2.69)

Performance/W
3550H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4