| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.4 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
4.31k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
17.51k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
10.53k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
23.57k (x4.71)
TOTAL
30.24k
55.92k (x1.85)

Multithread

3550H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
24.18k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
117.98k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
70.96k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
8.08k (x1.43)
TOTAL
108.67k
221.19k (x2.04)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
20.37k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
22.52k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
10.18k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
21.49k (x5.07)
TOTAL
45.07k
74.56k (x1.65)

Multithread

3550H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
144.01k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
191.86k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
84.53k (x3.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
6.5k (x1.34)
TOTAL
178.26k
426.9k (x2.39)

Performance/W
3550H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4