Ryzen 5 3500X vs N100
Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 4.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 4.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b06e0
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
15.23k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
11.04k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
5.54k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
4.98k (x0.24)
TOTAL
66.61k
36.79k (x0.55)
Multithread
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
37.07k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
32.57k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
14.75k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
3.9k (x0.04)
TOTAL
373.61k
88.29k (x0.24)
Performance/W
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4