Ryzen 5 3500X vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 5.4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 5.4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
306d4
Core
Matisse
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
2 /4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
68.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
13.58k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
12.14k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
3.18k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
2.92k (x0.14)
TOTAL
66.61k
31.81k (x0.48)
Multithread
3500X
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
28.89k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
28.74k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
7.31k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
3.74k (x0.04)
TOTAL
373.61k
68.69k (x0.18)
Performance/W
3500X
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
4579 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500X
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4