| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500X vs Ryzen 9 7950X


Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 7950X is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 4.3 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a60f12
Core
Matisse
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 2
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM5
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/32
TDP
65 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
131072 kB
Date
September 2019
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
1597.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
40.61k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
31.82k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
16.63k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
32.28k (x1.53)
TOTAL
66.61k
121.33k (x1.82)

Multithread

3500X

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
683.17k (x7.56)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
563.45k (x4.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
286.77k (x5.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
64.4k (x0.71)
TOTAL
373.61k
1597.79k (x4.28)

Performance/W
3500X
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
4019 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
3314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
379 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
9399 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500X
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
7124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
5582 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
2917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
5663 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
21286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4