Ryzen 5 3500X vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.7 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.7 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a70f41
Core
Matisse
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
622.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
31.57k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
25.2k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
12.42k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
21.93k (x1.04)
TOTAL
66.61k
91.11k (x1.37)
Multithread
3500X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
265.26k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
226.13k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
114.46k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
16.49k (x0.18)
TOTAL
373.61k
622.34k (x1.67)
Performance/W
3500X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
17781 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500X
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4