| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500X vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.1 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a50f00
Core
Matisse
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
426.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
20.37k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
22.52k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
10.18k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
21.49k (x1.02)
TOTAL
66.61k
74.56k (x1.12)

Multithread

3500X

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
144.01k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
191.86k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
84.53k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
6.5k (x0.07)
TOTAL
373.61k
426.9k (x1.14)

Performance/W
3500X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500X
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4