| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500X vs Ryzen 3 5300U


Description
Both models 3500X and 5300U are based on Zen 2 architecture.

Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.9 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
860f81
Core
Matisse
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
198.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
15.09k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
23.74k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
8.32k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
5.19k (x0.25)
TOTAL
66.61k
52.35k (x0.79)

Multithread

3500X

5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
67k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
89.94k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
36.84k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
4.6k (x0.05)
TOTAL
373.61k
198.38k (x0.53)

Performance/W
3500X
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
13226 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500X
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4