Ryzen 5 3500X vs Core i3-13100F
Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b06f5
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
390.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
47.14k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
25.77k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
13.25k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
14.77k (x0.7)
TOTAL
66.61k
100.94k (x1.52)
Multithread
3500X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
168.51k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
142.8k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
63.57k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
15.34k (x0.17)
TOTAL
373.61k
390.23k (x1.04)
Performance/W
3500X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
6728 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500X
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4