Ryzen 5 3500U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.7 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.7 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
406f1
Core
Picasso
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.24k
2.6k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
13.16k
7.55k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
2.61k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
2.03k (x0.61)
TOTAL
24.12k
14.79k (x0.61)
Multithread
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.95k
17.41k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
57.84k
75.46k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.05k
26.25k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.65k (x1.33)
TOTAL
95.36k
123.78k (x1.3)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
8.22k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
12.06k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.01k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
2.89k (x0.88)
TOTAL
35.65k
27.18k (x0.76)
Multithread
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
61.34k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
90.21k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
26.2k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
4.62k (x1.33)
TOTAL
149.23k
182.37k (x1.22)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
6.04k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
10.18k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
2.74k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
2.41k (x0.71)
TOTAL
37.37k
21.37k (x0.57)
Multithread
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
47.51k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
75.12k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
19.72k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
5.45k (x1.56)
TOTAL
146.6k
147.8k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
12.16k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
11.82k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
3.02k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
2.4k (x0.71)
TOTAL
36.64k
29.39k (x0.8)
Multithread
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
103.77k (x2.45)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
102.28k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
26.13k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
5.65k (x1.43)
TOTAL
140.97k
237.83k (x1.69)
Performance/W
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4