Ryzen 5 3500U vs Pentium G645
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the G645 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 149.2 k points while the G645 gets 35.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 4.2 times faster than the G645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 149.2 k points while the G645 gets 35.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 4.2 times faster than the G645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
206a7
Core
Picasso
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
22.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
35.38k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
8.66k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
6.9k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
3.48k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
3.2k (x0.97)
TOTAL
35.65k
22.24k (x0.62)
Multithread
3500U
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
14.06k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
11.82k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
5.83k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
3.69k (x1.06)
TOTAL
149.23k
35.38k (x0.24)
Performance/W
3500U
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
3219 points/W
216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4946 points/W
182 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1553 points/W
90 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
231 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
9949 points/W
544 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
3238 points/GHz
2987 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4283 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1224 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
890 points/GHz
1103 points/GHz
TOTAL
9634 points/GHz
7669 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4