Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 131.3 k points while the i5-7200U gets 98.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 131.3 k points while the i5-7200U gets 98.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.5k points
45.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
131.34k points
98.51k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.24k
3.08k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
13.16k
11.93k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
3.87k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
5.89k (x1.77)
TOTAL
24.12k
24.78k (x1.03)
Multithread
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.95k
6.25k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
57.84k
26.49k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.05k
9.18k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
6.04k (x1.72)
TOTAL
95.36k
47.95k (x0.5)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
11.12k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
16.05k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.12k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
5.72k (x1.74)
TOTAL
35.65k
37.01k (x1.04)
Multithread
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
20.96k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
32.09k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
8.56k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
5.76k (x1.66)
TOTAL
149.23k
67.37k (x0.45)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
11.36k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
17.26k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
4.03k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
4.77k (x1.41)
TOTAL
37.37k
37.42k (x1)
Multithread
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
24.08k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
41.23k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
10.19k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
4.72k (x1.35)
TOTAL
146.6k
80.22k (x0.55)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
19.33k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
17.86k
17.46k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.2k
4.05k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
4.42k (x1.18)
TOTAL
36.5k
45.25k (x1.24)
Multithread
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.94k
43k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
69k
41.67k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.01k
9.63k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
4.22k (x0.96)
TOTAL
131.34k
98.51k (x0.75)
Performance/W
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2596 points/W
2866 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4600 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/W
642 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
281 points/W
TOTAL
8756 points/W
6567 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2889 points/GHz
6236 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4826 points/GHz
5631 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1136 points/GHz
1305 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1013 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
TOTAL
9864 points/GHz
14596 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4