Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i5-2430M
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the i5-2430M gets 40.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 3.6 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the i5-2430M gets 40.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 3.6 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
206a7
Core
Picasso
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
22.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
40.76k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
8.04k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
7.37k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
3.53k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
3.27k (x0.96)
TOTAL
37.37k
22.21k (x0.59)
Multithread
3500U
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
15.74k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
14.05k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
7.16k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
3.81k (x1.09)
TOTAL
146.6k
40.76k (x0.28)
Performance/W
3500U
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
3049 points/W
450 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5032 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1459 points/W
205 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
9773 points/W
1165 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
3001 points/GHz
2680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
2458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
916 points/GHz
1091 points/GHz
TOTAL
10099 points/GHz
7404 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4