Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i5-10210U
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ec
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
23.11k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
20.58k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
4.73k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
7.43k (x2.21)
TOTAL
36.64k
55.86k (x1.52)
Multithread
3500U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
65.84k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
60.77k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
14.45k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
4.44k (x1.12)
TOTAL
140.97k
145.51k (x1.03)
Performance/W
3500U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4