Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.6 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.6 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0653
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
227.67k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.24k
4.32k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
13.16k
15.7k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.04k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
7.68k (x2.31)
TOTAL
24.12k
32.73k (x1.36)
Multithread
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.95k
16.59k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
57.84k
71.1k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.05k
23.26k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.86k (x1.1)
TOTAL
95.36k
114.81k (x1.2)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
13.84k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
19.79k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
5.28k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
8.31k (x2.53)
TOTAL
35.65k
47.22k (x1.32)
Multithread
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
54.67k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
90.71k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
24.11k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
3.85k (x1.11)
TOTAL
149.23k
173.34k (x1.16)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
13.88k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
20.94k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
5.18k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
8.2k (x2.42)
TOTAL
37.37k
48.19k (x1.29)
Multithread
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
54.88k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
93.17k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
23.34k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
3.85k (x1.1)
TOTAL
146.6k
175.24k (x1.2)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
24.31k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
22.15k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
5.14k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
8.46k (x2.52)
TOTAL
36.64k
60.06k (x1.64)
Multithread
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
101.48k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
98.04k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
24.28k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
3.86k (x0.98)
TOTAL
140.97k
227.67k (x1.62)
Performance/W
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4