Ryzen 5 3500U vs Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.5 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.5 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e8
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
58.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
210.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
22.46k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
20.45k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
4.75k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
10.39k (x3.09)
TOTAL
36.64k
58.05k (x1.58)
Multithread
3500U
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
92.69k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
90.45k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
22.02k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
5.75k (x1.45)
TOTAL
140.97k
210.91k (x1.5)
Performance/W
3500U
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W