| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500U vs 5600H


Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.8 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
255.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
14.34k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
17.67k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
6.41k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
14.95k (x4.45)
TOTAL
36.64k
53.37k (x1.46)

Multithread

3500U

5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
83.58k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
119.22k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
48.56k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
3.83k (x0.97)
TOTAL
140.97k
255.19k (x1.81)

Performance/W
3500U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
5671 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4