Ryzen 5 3500U vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.8 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.8 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f81
Core
Picasso
Dali
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
9.33k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
17.1k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
3.57k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
3.26k (x0.97)
TOTAL
36.64k
33.26k (x0.91)
Multithread
3500U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
22.14k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
40.04k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
10.71k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
5k (x1.26)
TOTAL
140.97k
77.88k (x0.55)
Performance/W
3500U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4