Ryzen 5 3500U vs FX 8350
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.2 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
600f20
Core
Picasso
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
9.85k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
8.41k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
3.58k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
6.32k (x1.86)
TOTAL
37.37k
28.16k (x0.75)
Multithread
3500U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
44.93k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
45.21k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
22.81k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
5.19k (x1.48)
TOTAL
146.6k
118.14k (x0.81)
Performance/W
3500U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3049 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5032 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1459 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
9773 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3001 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
916 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
10099 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4